When WCM is no longer fun
This week, I spent a lot of time in various discussions on the negatives of Web content management systems (WCM). For all the excitement us CMS enthusiasts have for WCM, there is also associated frustration that threatens to dampen our spirit and kill the mission.
At my day job, we have a WCM that was developed internally and is starting to show its age. This week's conversations made apparent to me that we not only have technical issues with the WCM to resolve but also some significant organizational and leadership issues. Some of the folks involved with the project have started to hit a wall and there is conversation taking place that we should contract the work out. I think there is always benefit to having someone outside the organization looking at the problem with fresh eyes. I'm just not so sure such decisions to contract out the job should be born from frustration alone.
I also wonder what the contractor would think once they realize the expectation is not only for them to fix our WCM but also to fix various organizational issues as well. Most WCM analysts and implementers I talk to find it no fun to work with customers that not only want them to provide a product and content management solution but also to make business decisions the customers should be making for themselves. Let's also not forget that WCM vendors and implementers are just as frustrated that there are answers to questions that still allude them despite all their expertise and knowledge on the subject.
Knowing both customer and vendor perspectives well, I would find it laughable that each asks the other for answers that none have except for the fact that asking such questions is beneficial to the industry as a whole. I think having both customer and seller frustrated with the state of WCM shows just how young this particular information system really is. The automobile has had over 120 years to perfect their car, while the CMS folks have only really been working on the WCM for the last 15 years. That's not much time to perfect solutions and why analysts, vendors, implementers and customers are still hitting so many brick walls.
Yet, for all the problems we still have with content management and WCM the signs are very encouraging. Earlier this week, Jon Marks helped start the conversation on fixing WCM stemming from his expected participation in a J.Boye panel discussion on the state of the WCM industry. Some of that conversation also took place on Twitter via #fixwcm and, as a side note, once again makes apparent to me the value of tweeting for business purposes.
The best thing that happens when people identify the issues is that they also take part in helping to identify the solutions. Jon Marks has compiled a list of some of the people that have blogged about their thoughts on fixing WCM. I also came across James Hoskins blog with a customer viewpoint that I can relate to too. There are some great ideas being offered on these blogs, but I hope those visiting the blogs do not only consider the ideas but also move forward in implementing necessary changes.
I'm also encouraged at my own workplace that at least the conversation is taking place. It is IT's job to get the organization to seeing the fruits of what a good WCM can do for us instead of being buried under current frustrations. We have enough skilled IT professional folks in and outside of the project that we're bound to eventually see the organization through the WCM problems it is facing. Some battles may have been lost, but surely the war has not been lost. The first sign that we're winning the WCM war will come the day we can say WCM is fun once more. For all of us, may that day come soon.
About this CMS Enthusiast
Bryan Ruby is the owner and editor for CMS Report. He founded CMSReport.com in 2006 on the belief that information technologists, website owners, and web developers desired visiting sites where they could learn about content management systems without the sales pitch. Outside of his late night blogging hours, he is the Information Technology Officer for a field office in the federal government.





Comments
#1 Asking questions
"...at least the conversation is taking place" is poinitant as this is the hurdle that pretty much all organisations have difficulty getting over. Something happens to organisations when systems are implemented - they stop talking about them! We have WCM products because web sites are complex. There are no other business systems that combine user managed content with business applications and tools. Think of a purchasing system (it does just one job). Think of a time scheduling system (it does just one job). Web sites are moving continually and if people stop talking/discussing/addressing then the web site as a business tool starts will lose "corporate momentum".
Perhaps implementations of WCM are painful (not mine, I hope) and the users are so relieved to have a site launched that the subject of improving or keeping momentum going is set aside - "it's too much hassle", "It'll cost too much", "It takes too long", "I really don't want to go through that again and now I have something else to do"
Perhaps that's where business culture needs addressing. Organisations should all have a board or committee consisting of users from across the business (not just IT or Comms) where discussions are always fresh and the excitement of WCM really can be kept alive and driven with the passion it desires.
Oh, and as for "asking questions", that's what a consultant's job is but they also need to be able to find the answers or to help the customer/end user find those answers. The experience and skill set of WCM 'consultants' is often very questionable - just because they're charged at £1k per day does not make them worth £1k per day...
#2 Many thanks for referencing
Many thanks for referencing my blog post.
I very much agree that beyond the debate we need to take action on both sides of the equation.
As you say, too many customers expect WCM Vendors and implementors to make business decisions for them that they should really be driving forward themselves. Many don't put in place the necessary organisational structures and strategies to maintain momentum on these types of projects after the initial aims of implementing a WCM are achieved.
That makes it too easy I think for vendors to make a sale, bank the cash and move on to the next prospects, and for implementors to take the plaudits for a nice fresh looking site that wins awards and achieves some short-term goals without much regard for how the client is going to keep it looking fresh and achieve those goals for themselves without the implementors having to hold their hands every time.
#3 Hit and Run
I think you're exactly right with regards to vendors/implementers often doing a "hit and run" and leaving the client a website that can't be managed on their own. The result is a site that slowly deteriorates.
A few years ago I did a friend's site on the very cheap and he didn't expect me to maintain it. The site has held together ok, especially when you consider how little I charged him, but I've also had to go in there to help him out now and then. When it was time for his site to go for another big update I decided not to take the job. It's not so much that I wasn't up for the challenge or willing to charge him more, but I thought he deserved to hire someone better than me. I don't do Web development/design on a full time basis and CMS Report as well as my "day job" keeps me busy enough.
Since then, this friend has hired "professionals" and is going up with a new site. I'm hoping the best for him...but so far I haven't seen a new infrastructure to maintain his site any better than the one I left him with. I'm hoping those implementing his new site proves me wrong.
I can easily recommend design/development companies to those with the big sites as well as with the cash. I still find it difficult to recommend implementers for small businesses that want a nice site but don't have huge piles of cash that these guys want.