The New York Times: "Times executives believed that publicity would raise Mr. Rohde's value to his captors as a bargaining chip and reduce his chance of survival. Persuading another publication or a broadcaster not to report the kidnapping usually meant just a phone call from one editor to another, said Bill Keller, executive editor of The Times.
But Wikipedia, which operates under the philosophy that anyone can be an editor, and that all information should be public, is a vastly different world."
Wikipedia Foundation: "With the support of over 125,000 donors from around the world, the
Wikimedia Foundation has achieved its goal of raising over $6 million
USD to sustain Wikipedia. As of today, the campaign has generated just
over $6.2 million USD."
Occasionally, I see a post that I have written as a reference in a white paper, a book, or somewhere else online. I actually started CMSReport.com as a place for me to learn more about Web content management systems and information systems. Whenever someone references CMS Report it signals that we have gone full circle where someone is also learning from me. There is not a more awesome feeling than this.
One thing I have yet to achieve is being a legitimate reference at Wikipedia. Until now! CMS Report is being referenced on the wiki page for Frog CMS.
For those that do not not know, phpRadiant was the original project name for this current Frog CMS. Frog CMS was inspired by the Ruby on Rails application, Radiant CMS. Naturally, after two years in development, the developers for Frog CMS have become inspired with their own roadmap for building this CMS. Frog is currently available at version 0.9.5 from the Frog CMS download page.
A couple years ago we decided to use MediaWiki for a wiki implementation at work. Wikipedia uses MediaWiki for their wiki application so we felt it was the right choice for our needs. One concern my team had was that MediaWiki didn't come with a rich text editor (no WYSIWYG).
While a number of us may be fine with using wikitext or HTML to edit our wiki pages, I believe the majority in any organization prefers to edit their pages with a friendly user interface similar to that found on their word processor. At the time, we tried a number of solutions but found neither the suggested TinyMCE or FCKeditor implementation integrated that well with mediaWiki. So for our project we settled with wikEd, an editor that still required users to work with wiki syntax but surprising a very good tool for most users.
During a lunch conversation last week with Deane Barker of Gadgetopia and Blend Interactive, I mentioned my frustrations with MediaWiki not having available a good WYSIWYG solution. Deane suggested that I look at a more recent implementation of MediaWiki plus FCKeditor. This project is being supported by the developers of FCKeditor themselves.
"Lessig, known for his decade-long role in trying to loosen the
entertainment industry's vice-like grip on popular culture by shaping
copyright law, is betting that the energy and dissatisfaction exhibited
by voters against the status-quo in Washington DC, and the emergence of
collaborative software that enables vast numbers of
geographically-dispersed citizens to become politically active on their
own schedule, will enable a new kind of transparency and accountability
in political campaigns."
"Social-media sites like Wikipedia and Digg
are celebrated as shining examples of Web democracy, places built by
millions of Web users who all act as writers, editors, and voters. In
reality, a small number of people are running the show. According to
researchers in Palo Alto, 1 percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits. The site also deploys bots—supervised
by a special caste of devoted users—that help standardize format,
prevent vandalism, and root out folks who flood the site with
obscenities. This is not the wisdom of the crowd. This is the wisdom of
the chaperones."
Wikis are useful business tools. With planning and some staff time, you
can make your own online collection of useful articles, tailored to
your organization's needs, to communicate about business processes,
manage collective know-how and more.