opinion

Windows XP SP3, Internet Explorer 6, and Complacency

Opinion: Microsoft has never said that they would drop support for Internet Explorer 6 (IE6) after the release of Windows XP Service Pack 3. However, I've often wondered if it would be to Microsoft's advantage, as well as beneficial to their customers, if they did drop the IE6 support. With Internet Explorer 7 (IE7) now the status quo for most non-Enterprise users of Windows and IE8 development underway, what better opportunity is there to end support for IE6 than now?

There is no question that Microsoft is supporting IE6 in the next service pack. Jane Maliouta, Microsoft's Deployment Project Manager for IE8, addressed IE6 support with XP SP3 in an IEBlog post on IE and Windows XP SP3.

XPSP3 will continue to ship with IE6 and contains a roll-up of the latest security updates for IE6. If you are still running Internet Explorer 6, then XPSP3 will be offered to you via Windows Update as a high priority update. You can safely install XPSP3 and will have an updated version of IE6 with all your personal preferences, such as home pages and favorites, still intact.

So the question remains, just how long does Microsoft plan to support this 7 year old browser? From as near as I can tell, support for Internet Explorer 6 is tied to the life cycle of the Windows XP operating system. Mainstream support for Windows XP is currently dated to end in April 14, 2009. So that means Internet Explorer 6 will have been on the desktop for more than eight years! While enterprises may take comfort that product support for Windows XP and IE6 has lasted so long, consumers and the rest of the world have since moved on with the changing world.

When Bloggers Return for More Blogging

Blog Herald: Bloggers are not gone for long, though some manage to stay away a year or so. Typically, all return for more, and what they bring with them is fascinating to watch.

Complete Story

 

OpenEdit: 10 Reasons Databases Suck

"While the misconception that a database is an absolute requirement for complex web applications may not be listed as the second most common error of the 21st century, it is a misconception that continues to go largely unchallenged."

Complete Story

Karen Bauman: All you need is love

Karen Bauman, Antigrammar.com, reminds us that once you receive something, the importance of giving something back.

I have noticed a trend on various blogs to have a special Sunday post linking to some of the better articles written throughout the week. I think this is a fine practice and I would like to try that someday. Unfortunately, however, I am feeling

  • far too lazy
  • much too self centered

to go to that much trouble. I am going to go through my referral logs instead and tell you all who it was that sent me traffic during this past week. Anyone reading this who wishes to be listed here in weeks to come, well, I think you know what to do.

Here at CMSReport.com, some of the biggest gifts we receive are from those leaving their own comments and opinions here at the site. Our "giving back" is via the Blogroll. Those sites and people listed in the Blogroll had something of value to say in a comment or article left here at CMSReport.com.

TCW: Was It Good Writing or a Poor Choice of Words?

"That said, life is not one big family gathering. Religion and politics—and other topics that might be taboo at the dinner table—are certainly appropriate fodder to weave into many other conversations. But, is it appropriate for a writer sharing his opinions on The Content Wrangler website to use politically-charged language to illustrate a point, lead the reader down a specific thought path, or tempt them into clicking on a hypertext link? When does a writer go too far in attracting attention?"

Complete Story

Walt Mossberg on the Asus Eee PC

My apologies for writing so much about hardware and not content management this week. I suppose though, if Dean Barker at Gadgetopia can talk about content management, I can occasionally discuss gadgets here at CMS Report. Sometimes it helps to take a look at the devices we use to view our content just as much as it helps looking at the software we use to run our Web content management systems. Well, at least this is my excuse for not being fixated so much on content management.

In Thursday morning's Wall Street Journal, Walt Mossberg did a review of the Asus Eee PC. The article, Asus Offers Travelers Small, Mobile Eee PC, but It’s Too Cramped, can be found in his column archive (a Wordpress site). I had been waiting for someone of his stature do a review on this product, but I was a little disappointed to see yet another review of a non-Apple device (this one is Linux based) be so negative.

Larry Garfield: Where are the PHP 4 developers?

"Marco Tabini, of php|architect magazine fame among other things, has been openly disappointed at the death of PHP 4. Not because he likes PHP 4, but because of the "OMG you're discontinuing something that everyone's still using!" argument.

I like your magazine, Marco, but I have to disagree with you on this one. Smile"

Complete Story

Kanellos: How to be a tech blowhard

"Has Facebook replaced government?

This is the sort of outlandish speculation I've come to know and love from an industry that thrives on hype. As far as I can tell, no one has actually said it yet, but let's give it time: It's not even lunchtime, and any number of theories are bound to pop up before the end of the day."

 

Complete Story

Collaboration Loop: The Death of Wikipedia?

I have been struggling to decide what I think about the Wikipedia/WikiScanner episode that played out last week.  Collaboration Loop had some thoughts of their own in the article, The Death of Wikipedia?
But with the release of Wikiscanner we now find that organizations are actively trolling Wikipedia to help themselves, or to hurt others.   We find that our level of trust in Wikipedia has been significantly impugned.  We find that the social computing model is suspect to abuse from those who aren’t playing by the rules.  In effect, our naïve view of the world of wikis is destroyed.
No doubt there are many organizations and individuals that attempted to edit their "own pages" about themselves to correct what they honestly thought were mistakes or untruths.  But even when all parties are open and honest, there will be conflict.

Linux.com and NewsForge.com

Is there anyone else disappointed that Linux.com and NewsForge.com now mirror each other in content?  In the past I've called this the CMS déjà vu phenomenon.  I'm not sure what to think about it.  No wait, I do know what I think about the two sites basically merging into one...I don't like it.  I really do miss the diversity in stories the two separate sites once offered.

Thumbnail of NewsForge.com  Thumbnail of Linux.com

Am I am the only not liking the change?  Yea, yea, I know...Linux.com and NewsForge.com have every right to do what they do.  That's not my point...this time it's about me...
Syndicate content