10 New Content Management Systems via CMS Focus

Bryan's picture
Submitted by Bryan on

Our CMS Focus page lists the top 30 content management systems that we want to discuss most here at CMS Report. It has been more than a year and a half since I made any changes to this list and so I decided it was time to make some significant changes. On this page you'll now find 10 new CMS that have been added to the list as well as ten previously listed CMS that were "retired" to the "Hall of Fame".

The applications listed under CMS Focus are not necessarily the biggest and most popular in content management, but instead are CMSs that for whatever reason have caught and kept my attention. If you find value in the CMS Focus page then that's great news and I'm glad I could help. If you find little value in lists such as these, that's fine too and I hope that you can find other content here at CMS Report that at least plays a role in your quest for a better CMS solution.

For those curious, the following ten web applications were added to CMS Focus:

TipsFor.US: Wordpress vs. MODx

Bryan's picture
Submitted by Bryan on

Everett Griffiths recently wrote a comparison between WordPress and MODx over at TipsFor.US. In the article he walks the reader through various CMS comparison factors such as installation, templating, menus, plugins, architecture, custom content, security, and support. This comparison specifically focuses on WordPress 3.1 and MODx Revolution.

Everett writes:

There are a lot of Content Management Systems (CMS’s) out there, so I wanted to give a blow-by-blow analysis comparing two of them: MODx and WordPress. I feel oddly qualified to do so: Brian and I just authored a book on WordPress plugin plugin development (WordPress 3 Plugin Development), and I am a MODx Solution Partner who was invited to speak at the MODxpo conference in Dallas last year. I’ve used both flavors of MODx (Evolution and Revolution) and WordPress while building somewhere around 50 web sites over the past couple years, and I like both systems. I have even contributed a couple plugins for both systems (e.g. Custom Content Type Manager for WordPress). So after the urging of some friends and colleagues (like Kris), I’m organizing my techno-ramblings into a coherent article.

This articles is a fair comparison between WordPress and MODx.  If you're interested in reading the details of the article you should read the original article, WordPress vs. MODx, at the TipsFor.US site.

Judging Five Open Source Content Management Systems

Bryan's picture
Submitted by Bryan on

Last fall, I once again had the privilege of participating as a member of the judging panel for Packt Publishing's Open Source Awards. For the 2010 event, I participated by voting for the category of Open Source CMS Awards. In that award, the winner was declared by the panel to be CMS Made Simple, with SilverStripe as first runner up followed by MODx as second runner up.

I received a lot of inquiries asking me how and in what order did I rank the content management systems. Each of the judges on the panel, selects and ranks their top three CMS from the five included in this category. The judges are given a lot of reign for how they rank the CMS and may consider a number of factors including performance, usability, size and support from community, accessibility, ease of configuration, customization, scalability and security.

It has been my history to be transparent to all with how I rank each CMS as my vote will have some differences to those of the panel. This time around, I find myself hesitant and under personal protest with me providing information on how I ranked the five content management systems.

I question whether we're doing any good by declaring one CMS as better than another CMS. Dean Barker discussed on his blog some time ago this same uneasy feeling you get when you judge a CMS without having some reference to real world requirements. None of these content management systems would I consider losers and all of them remain worthy of future consideration. Yet, I'm disturbed that people will look at the numbers and interpret the results in a ways I never intended my rankings to be used.

My rankings for the Five Best Open Source CMS (with number one being the highest) were:

  1. SilverStripe
  2. mojoPortal
  3. MODx
  4. XOOPS and CMS Made Simple (Tie)

I'm not a firm believer in ties when it comes to ranking content management systems. Yet, this year I did just that for XOOPS and CMS Made Simple. All five content management systems that were reviewed I would consider as a candidate for a future project. None of the CMS would I consider a "last place" CMS so I refused to do so. It is also important to note that neither Drupal, Joomla!, or WordPress competed in this ranking as previous winners in this category duke it out in the Hall of Fame category.

Open Source versus the Enterprise Solution

Tim Ward's picture
Submitted by Tim Ward on

Let me start by clarifying a few things:

1) I work for a CMS vendor, for an enterprise CMS.

2) I am also a big fan of open source.

Yet, I am attempting to write this article with all bias aside; with all generalizations thrown out the window. Without feeling like I am trying to justify this article, I think it is also worth mentioning that the CMS vendor that I work for produces a product that I would avidly use even if I didn’t work for them.

Every vendor, whether they are enterprise or open source do research on their competition. Although the internal information that these vendors have are usually pretty good, there is not a lot of thorough comparisons readily available on the net. When I look on the web, all I see are generalizations. I want to get rid of this, drop biased opinions and give you the hard, honest truth. Sure, I can only talk from my experience, and I have not used every CMS under the sun, but I have had the pleasure (and sometimes pain) of using a diverse range; enough, I would say to be able to stoke the fires. To back this up if someone asked me:

  • What is the best photo editing software? I would give an honest answer of Photoshop. But Paint.net is free and so is Gimp, I hear you say. Although expensive, it is the best tool for the job.
  • What is the best Media Player? I would say VLC! But Microsoft had dedicated teams to build Windows Media Player, I hear you say! Doesn’t matter, VLC is free and the best tool for the job.
  • What is the best Developer Environment? I would say Visual Studio? But I don’t use .net, I hear you say! Great, because you should choose the best tool for YOUR job…..the whole point I am trying to get across with this article.
  • What is the best FTP Client? I would say FileZilla!
  • What is the best browser? There is no ONE tool for the job.

I think it is important to first define what the two systems are in order to be able to thoroughly compare the two options.

  • Open source describes practices in production and development that promote access to the end product's source materials. The public is allows to copy, modify and redistribute the source code without paying royalties or fees. Some consider open source a philosophy, others consider it a pragmatic methodology.
  • Proprietary software is computer software licensed under exclusive legal right of its owner. The purchaser, or licensee, is given the right to use the software under certain conditions, but restricted from other uses, such as modification, further distribution, or reverse engineering.

From a high level perspective you could argue that both have advantages and disadvantages. It is only when you analyze the functionality of the two systems when the decision on what way to go is made that much easier.

DotNetNuke vs Kentico vs Umbraco - Leading ASP.NET CMSs Compared Side by Side

webby's picture
Submitted by webby on

WebmasterFormat.com: DotNetNuke, Kentico, and Umbraco are all among the top CMS options available using the .NET framework. But even after you have reviewed each one of them independently, it can be difficult to gain a truly comparative insight into what each product has to offer. By arranging all 3 products into one feature-based table, it becomes easier to analyze similarities and highlight any beneficial features.

Magnolia CMS Earns Top Ratings in Ars Logica Report

NEW YORK, NY — Magnolia, the open source content management vendor that delivers simplicity on an enterprise scale, today announced that Magnolia 4.3 earned high business and technical scores in an independent Ars Logica review. Magnolia was among the first four Ars Logica Compass Guides to Web Content Management, a comprehensive set of product evaluations of 35+ leading CMS vendors.

The independent report on open source Magnolia CMS 4.3, based on an exhaustive 172-item vendor questionnaire, hands-on product testing, and customer interviews, cites Magnolia’s “extreme technical refinement that consistently garners highest praise from those interested in technology for its own sake,” and “a polished user interface that non-technical business users have taken to easily.” The report notes, “the STK forms a flexible foundation on which designers and developers can build original websites, repurposing the templates as they see fit.”As a result, Ars Logica “found Magnolia to be highly competitive technically with the most expensive enterprise-scalecommercial WCM products on the market today.”

The Ars Logica report gave Magnolia high marks on its business and technical report cards, including 8.9 for usability, 8.7 for scalability, 7.7 for development tools, and 7.6 for ease of administration.

“We are up against a number of major players in an extremely competitive CMS industry, so it is most gratifying to see the high scores we achieved in the independent Ars Logica review,”said Felix Stern, Magnolia CEO. “The report affirms our strategy to deliver open source simplicity and flexibility on an enterprise scale.”

The Compass Guide evaluation of Magnolia is available as a free downloaded from the Ars Logica web site at http://www.arslogica.com/compass_guide/magnoliasoftware-compassguide.html.

Now available for download: Hippo CMS 7.4 with the Go Green demo

Hippo CMS 7.4 features numerous advanced features and improvements focused on ever increasing ease of use and control over the presentation layer straight from the CMS interface. Of course the new release also includes fixes and an automatic upgrade path from 7.3.

Highlights of the 7.4 features:

  • Version comparison allowing you to easily see the differences between versions and published and draft variants
  • Goto-preview plugin, enables you to quickly navigate to the right place in the web site from the editor
  • An improved image picker that supports search, file upload, image preview, etc
  • An improved link picker that allows you to search for the document that you want to link to
  • Wide document listing; the document listing view is extended with an additional mode allowing you to see meta data properties like modified and published date and the last user who modified it.
  • Single Sign On support, allowing developers to easily integrate using JAAS with external authentication providers
  • Multiple file upload, the image gallery now allows you to upload multiple or all files from a single directory in a single click
  • The where-used functionality now also checks if images are referenced.
  • Multi-channel publishing: publish to the web, a calendar, a mobile site, or to an augmented reality browser - all from the same content source.
  • Faceted navigation: create dynamic, drill-down navigation structures and present content in different contexts

Packt's 2010 Open Source Awards now open

The 2010 Open Source Awards was launched yesterday by Packt, inviting people to visit www.PacktPub.com and submit nominations for their favorite Open Source project. Now in its fifth year, the Award has been adapted from the established Open Source CMS Award with the wider aim of encouraging, supporting, recognizing and rewarding all Open Source projects.

WordPress won the 2009 Open Source Content Management System (CMS) Award in what was a very close contest with MODx and SilverStripe. While MODx was the first runner up, SilverStripe, a Most Promising CMS Award winner in 2008, made its way to the second runner up position in its first year in the Open Source CMS Award final.

The 2010 Award will feature a prize fund of $24,000 with several new categories introduced. While the Open Source CMS Award category will continue to recognize the best content management system, Packt is introducing categories for the Most Promising Open Source Project, Open Source E-Commerce Applications, Open Source JavaScript Libraries and Open Source Graphics Software. CMSes that won the Overall CMS Award in previous years will continue to compete against one another in the Hall of Fame CMS category.

These new categories will ensure that the Open Source Awards is the ultimate platform to recognise excellence within the community while supporting projects both new and old. “We believe that the adaption of the Award and the new categories will provide a new level of accessibility, with the Award recognizing a wider range of Open Source projects; both previous winners while at the same time, encouraging new projects” said Julian Copes, organizer of this year’s Awards.

Packt has opened up nominations for people to submit their favorite Open Source projects for each category at www.PacktPub.com/open-source-awards-home . The top five in each category will go through to the final, which begins in the last week of September. For more information on the categories, please visit Packt’s website at www.PacktPub.com/blog/packt’s-2010-open-source-awards-announcement

Someone does another Drupal vs Joomla comparison

Bryan's picture
Submitted by Bryan on

It has been an extremely long time since I've done any type of comparision between Drupal and Joomla!. While I like to keep a close eye on both of these open source content management systems...I just haven't felt the need to compare the two applications with each other. The rhythm of each of the two CMS are so different that I honestly don't know what I would write in the Drupal vs Joomla post. Comparing Drupal and Joomla with each other is like comparing Country music and Jazz with each genre not really capable of diminishing the importance of the other.

This isn't to say such comparisons can't be interesting and useful. I definitely know how popular Drupal vs. Joomla! articles can be and the number of visitors such articles will bring to a site.  If you're interested in reading a new Drupal vs Joomla article, you can find such an article at Achieve Internet.

Some of the comparisons are out of date or lack sufficient technical detail to fully support their conclusions. Furthermore, both Joomla! and the Drupal CMS are on the verge of releasing new versions, Joomla! 1.6 and Drupal 7, that will move both products in a positive direction.

This series of articles attempts to address where the technologies stand now, with a keen eye on the fact that both are moving targets as they approach new releases. The focus will be on using the web design software to build enterprise level websites, including those for large businesses, government agencies, and sizable non-profits, as this is the focus of Achieve Internet, based in San Diego, CA. We will examine the following topics from a technical perspective: baseline content management system (CMS) functionality, back-end appearance and functionality, and coding & customization.

If you're interested in hearing more from Achieve Internet, the article you'll want to read is Joomla! vs. Drupal for enterprise web development, Part 1.

A Quick Review of the 7 Best ASP.NET Content Management Systems

webby's picture
Submitted by webby on

Deciding what content management system to use is one of the most important decisions which is not easy to make, this can be especially true if you are deciding on an ASP.NET CMS. There are a variety of options available, both open source and commercial. In order to make a solid decision, it is important to identify your specific needs and find a content management system that matches your needs. Here is a quick look at 7 of the most popular and most powerful ASP.NET content management systems available (in no particular order).

Sharepoint 2010 vs WCM Platforms

Sharepoint 2010 has just been released and everyone is excited about the possibilities and the unique advantage it can lend to their business. Specifically, there has been a lot of talk about Sharepoint’s new web content management capabilities. A lot of folks are wondering if they could possibly use the new Sharepoint release as the technology stack to maintain both their enterprise collaboration needs and their corporate website. In this article, we will review the new Sharepoint 2010 web content management capabilities and how they may fit your organization’s strategic website objectives at this time.

Sharepoint Capabilities

Let’s begin our discussions by reviewing, at a very high level, what specific business problems Sharepoint was meant to solve.

Microsoft designed Sharepoint as a collaboration platform to address specific business needs, such as – Collaboration, Secure Portals, Data Integration, Document Management, Records Management, Search & Discovery…

Further to this, the platform offers robust APIs, which allow extension of the base platform to third party solutions that address specific business needs for corporations in the mid to enterprise markets.

Sharepoint is generally viewed in the market as an ECM (Enterprise Content Management) platform with enriched web editing capabilities. It has inbuilt support for collaboration, back office integration, secure role based access, workflows & business process automation, document indexing, search & discovery capabilities. Most of all it offers some capacity for consistent branding and layouts across the organization.

Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Core Components

Buytaert on the Joomla vs Drupal business models

Bryan's picture
Submitted by Bryan on

Just started reading Drupal's Dries Buytaert's blog posting titled, Joomla vs Drupal: business models and commercial ecosystem. The article comes just a week after he attended CMS Expo and are some of his thoughts on the Drupal/Joomla! comparisons many of us do with open source CMS.

But what does the future hold? The Drupal community seems to be expanding into the enterprise, whereas the Joomla community is expanding into, well ... Drupal. All the Joomla companies that I talked to at CMSExpo were in the process of taking their products and services to the Drupal market and rebranding their organizations to be cross-CMS compatible.

When time allows, I may add my own thoughts about Dries' article in this post as well as a comment over at Buytaert.net. In the meantime, please be sure to read the comments in the article (no flame war so far, yea!) as there is a lot of substance in the comment section too.

Oshyn, Inc: Choosing open source content management systems

There are right and wrong reasons for choosing Open Source CMS or WCM platforms and explains why Open Source CMS is not free and can actually come with a high price tag…or not.

Los Angeles, CA – In this latest free white paper, “Open Source CMS: Is It Right for your Organization?”, Oshyn shares an in-depth look at the pros and cons of using Open Source Content Management Systems (CMS) or Open Source Web Content Management (WCM) platforms. Oshyn has integrated many commercial and Open Source CMS/WCM solutions. Oshyn helps clients select CMS/WCM solutions based on the specific requirements of each client such as: understanding the capabilities required for content re-use, integration, personalization, ecommerce, workflows, online marketing, multilingual content, multi-device content, affiliate content sharing and future development plans.

Authored by Oshyn’s Chief Operating Officer, Travis Cole, and Senior Consultants, Christian Burne and Prasanth Nittala, this free white paper draws from Oshyn’s extensive experience in Content Management Systems development and integration. Specifically this Open Source CMS white paper explores:

  • The Real Cost of Open Source Content Management Systems
  • Importance of the Open Source CMS Development Community
  • The Wrong Reasons for Choosing Open Source CMS
  • Open Source CMS Security
  • Outsourcing Open Source CMS projects

Joomla and Ecommerce – Quite a Pair

webby's picture
Submitted by webby on

Is Joomla the Best Choice for Your New Ecommerce Website? Joomla has always been known as one of the best content management systems available. However, is it the best option as an ecommerce solution? There are many viable alternatives such as Wordpress, Drupal, and Magento, but how to they stack up? When most people think about Joomla and ecommerce, they automatically think about VirtueMart. However, there are several other options available to Joomla users.

Pages